Sailor Athlete Council Conference Call Minutes
9-27-04
Attending: Dean Brenner, Susannah Carr, Hal Haenel,
Cory Sertl, Lee Parks, Hannah Swett, Mark Reynolds, Tom Leweck, Kim
Hapgood, Betsy Altman, Bob Merrick, Sandy Grosvenor, Bob Bellingham
1. Dean introduced new members to the Council.
Conversation about how SAC adds value to sailors and US SAILING is
ongoing. He reiterated SAC’s mission, to “maintain
an avenue for sailor-athletes in US SAILING to voice their opinions, and
to provide a forum and opportunity to have a meaningful impact on the
future and direction of our sport.” Brenner asked current SAC
members to share with newcomers their thoughts on the Council and how it
can add value to US SAILING and to sailors. A general discussion of SAC’s
accomplishments during the past year, whom SAC represents, and SAC’s
relationship with US SAILING’s Olympic Sailing Committee followed. SAC
has reached out to registered athletes on 2 issues: the proposed
restructuring of US SAILING and ISAF equipment selection. In general, the
committee agrees that SAC represents competitive sailors and must strike a
balance between focusing on elite athletes and less serious racers. There
is not a formal relationship between SAC and OSC, but the committees share
members. Though the information has become more transparent, finding out
where Olympic funding goes is still difficult. US SAILING governs general
sailing and Olympic Sailing, however, a significant amount of the Olympic
money comes from USOC and goes through US SAILING directly to the athletes
USOC has decided to fund. US SAILING separates the OSC budget from the
rest of its budget. This quadrennium, the budget US SAILING submits to
USOC on October 6, 2004 must cover all four years. Funding is based on
medal performance, so difficult to predict how much money sailing will
get. The Council also discussed sailor Hugh Elliot’s email. Brenner
summarized by saying that SAC will be at its best when members are finding
out through their circulation in the sport what issues matter, expressing
opinions to the organization, and being the conduit for information
between sailors and US SAILING
2. Betsy Altman emphasized the importance of
attending the US SAILING Annual General Meeting October 20 – 24 in
Portland, OR. The Council agreed it should continue to work to place
registered athletes onto committees, including committees that fall
outside of the USOC mandate. Currently, SAC has approximately 575
registered athletes, up from 250 at the beginning of the year. The
Council agreed to continue to work to increase the number of registered
athletes by reaching out to sailors at qualifying regattas and maintaining
outgoing communication.
3. Dean Brenner requested that Council members unable
to attend submit a proxy to ensure SAC gets its maximum number of votes.
He will be soliciting input from council members via
email regarding SAC’s plans for the meeting.
4. A new chairperson, vice-chairperson and secretary
need to be elected this fall. In late Oct., SAC will have an online
nomination and election process for a new chair.
5. Hal Haenel informed SAC that the AAC
representative to the USOC is up for reelection this year in November. US
SAILING’s OSC runs this election. SAC ratified the procedure. The
Council reviewed the procedure for determining how the US delegates to
ISAF will vote regarding equipment selection for the 2008 Olympics. OSC
instructs ISAF members how to vote. The tight competitions are Hobie v.
Tornado, Europe v. Radial, and 470 v. 49er v. Snipe. Council members
shared their opinions on various boats. SAC will suggest to OSC that it
includes a discussion of the 2012 Olympics during its meeting at the
Annual General Meeting. Sailing will be losing a medal in 2012. Louise
Gleason and Hal Haenel volunteered to spearhead soliciting input from
council members and class reps about equipment selection. ISAF sent a
questionnaire to all classes regarding class participation, equipment,
etc. That information will be presented in Copenhagen at ISAF annual
meeting. Boardsailing is undergoing equipment trials right now. US ISAF
delegates will probably go with an OSC mandate to support/not support
boards and evaluate the equipment choices at the meeting because results
from equipment tests are not back yet. ISAF is decreasing the ability of
its council to overturn decisions.
6. Betsy Altman and Louise Gleason reminded the
Committee that SAC has 20% of the votes at the Annual General Meeting.
7. Dean Brenner is compiling a summary of all the
feedback he has gotten regarding the proposal to change US SAILING’s
organizational structure. He will circulate it to SAC. Brenner
recommended that all new council members read the proposed new structure.
The general direction is to reduce size of board and make it less
constituent based.
Meeting adjourned.