US SAILING JUDGES COMMITTEE
AGM - Thursday, October 16, 2003
St. Louis, Missouri
Open Session
[As per Judges Committee policy, minutes will
automatically be approved 2 weeks after posting (Jan 12, 2004), unless
comments are received]
Except as noted by an asterisk (*) below, all members of the Judges
Committee and Lacey Given (US SAILING Race Administration Director) were
present:
Ted Everingham (Chair)
Kirk Brown (Chair, Umpires Subcommittee)
Debbie Schoenherr (Secretary)
Regional Administrative Judges (RAJs)
John Dieselman (Area A) *
Bruce Cook (Area B)*
Sandy Grosvenor (Area C) |
Burton Howell (Area D)
Mike Tapert (Area E)*
Gail Bernstein (Area F)
Tom Roberts (Area G)*
Joe James (Area H-East)*
Joe Cochran (Area H - West)*
Barry Ault (Area J)
Warwick Coppleson (Area K) |
**Mr. Wrigley represented the Umpires Subcommittee, in Mr. Brown's
absence.
Mr. Everingham called the meeting to order at 9:40 a.m.
A short introduction of JC members and guests followed.
AREA REPORTS
A John Dieselman reported there were 35 judges in Area A which he
expects to remain stable in the future. Approximately 60% need renewal in
'03 - '04, (8 - 10 of which their intentions are unknown).
D Burton Howell reported he is presently maintaining files on 40 US
Sailing Certified Judges in Area D. Since the Spring Meeting there is one
new Certified Judge in the Area and one Judge has relocated to Area F. He
has one new Judge's application, which is being processed. There are two
JITs who will probably submit their applications within a month. There are
also two JITs who should be ready to submit their applications in 2004. He
expects there to be one Judge who will not be renewed at the end of 2003.
There is a Workshop and Exam scheduled for November 8 and 9, 2003 at the
Coral Reef Yacht Club in Miami. Walter Chamberlain will be the Instructor
with David Brennan assisting.
K Warwick Coppleson reported that a Seminar was just completed in his
Area. He has organized a mentoring program for training potential
candidates that he is willing to share with other members of the
committee.
F Gail Bernstein reported 1 new judge to be certified as the
application is in. She is scheduling a training seminar early in 2004.
C Sandy Grosvenor reported renewals have been good and she has 3
applications in progress. A seminar will be held in December '03.
J Barry Ault reported a good year as a few new judges have been added
with some applications in process. He is holding an Area seminar on Nov.
15th, '03. Barry is somewhat concerned about future #'s of judges in the
Area, but is working on it.
UMPIRE SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT - KIRK BROWN
Here are the goals we set out for 2003. The status is in CAPS.
1. Team race Umpire Seminar ready to roll out in March. DONE
2. Rework slightly the written examination. Add questions and diagrams.
Develop our questions database. DONE-MORE WORK NEEDED ON DATABASE
3. Complete the on-the-water assessment vehicle. DONE-ONLINE
4. Finalize our on-the-water assessor list. DONE
5. Finalize our approved seminar giver team. DONE
6. Develop an outline of seminar materials so the seminar is portable.
Make plans to have the seminar portable in 2004. MOSTLY DONE-FINE TUNING
IN PROGRESS
7. Develop a way to link up umpires who want work and events that need
umpires. NOT DONE
8. Develop an event reporting system that allows us to keep our finger on
the pulse of umpires working in the field so that we might provide better
training where we see a need. DONE-LACEY TO HAVE THIS ON LINE
9. Add a boat driving training program through the existing resources at
US Sailing. NOT DONE
10. Develop a TSS vehicle to do a real time series of test questions. NOT
DONE
11. Insure that the website is current and up to date. DONE AND IN
PROGRESS
12. Develop an on line umpire application. DONE
13. Develop a mentoring program for new umpires. DONE IN AN INFORMAL WAY.
For 2004, the USC has the following goals:
1. Develop a way to link up umpires who want work and events that need
umpires.
2. Develop a database of test questions, 15 for Part A and 10 each for
parts C and D.
3. Complete the work on the seminar.
4. Identify any additional assessors and seminar givers (if necessary).
5. Continue to develop the website.
6. Insure that items listed on the web conform to practices in place.
7. More clearly define the duties of each member of the committee.
8. Refine what we have done in 2003.
Assessors Seminar Givers
Kirk Brown Kirk Brown
Ted Everingham Ted Everingham
Steve Wrigley Steve Wrigley
Don Becker Don Becker
Steve Shepstone Steve Shepstone
Tom Farquhar Tom Farquhar
Barbara Farquhar Barbara Farquhar
Bruce Cook Tom Dugan
Don Makiowlecki Brad Dellenbaugh
Brad Dellenbaugh
Jim Capron
This has been a very productive year. We have certified 4 umpires, have 7
umpires that will have applications in during this year, and have 11
people working on certification.
Kirk S. Brown
Chairman
UPDATED CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS & APPLICATION FORMS
Mr. Everingham thanked Sandy Grosvenor, Kirk Brown, Burton Howell and
Debbie Schoenherr for their work on getting the new forms tweaked and
approved. Sandy reported that the certification updates and new forms have
been posted to the website. The question was raised as to the date
effective with the response being NOW! However all RAJ's were urged not to
pull anyone's application, just review and update where necessary.
RACE OFFICIAL'S AT US SAILING CHAMPIONSHIPS
Mr. Everingham introduced this policy submitted by the Race
Administration Committee to Ex-Comm and ratified at their September
Meeting. All Championships are to adhere to the new policy in the future.
See attached copy.
RULES ENFORCEMENT DISCUSSION
Is "self-policing" working? At Junior Regattas? At Open
Regattas?
Barry Ault led off a discussion on blatant rule violations and
sportsmanship at Youth Championships and Top Junior Regattas. There has
been a general feeling amongst Judges attending these regattas that the
rules and exonerations are being disregarded most of the time, including
contact with damage and violations with many boats involved.
Discussion & Opinions of those present:
· Means Davis spoke about Opti events, stating that they have devised
a system wherein Observers who witness violations of Part 2 blow a whistle
to remind competitors to take action or the JC will.
· Allen Teske reports they often have the OA introduce the Judges who
review their observations with the competitors after racing.
· Debbie Schoenherr suggested having a short talk with the competitors at
the Skipper's meeting reviewing Fundamental Rule 2 and informing the
competitors of the Judges expectations.
· Ron Ward feels very pessimistic after observing many events including
Opti events where sportsmanship and rule adherence was very disappointing.
· Art Engel with the Rules Committee thinks the problem spans to Adults
also. The Rules Committee is concerned that the competitors are afraid to
protest as they feel they have a 50/50 chance of being dsq'd themselves.
· Other concerns related to Instructors of Junior programs and Collegiate
Coaches not training their students in Rules, protests and self-policing.
Conclusions
· The need exists to inform & make policy.
· This is not a Rules problem.
· Interacting with competitors is a good policy.
· Penalizing by Judges protesting may be needed.
Suggested Solutions
· Emphasize @ US Sailing Level Instructors courses
· Inform competitors at Skipper's Meetings
· Require Jr. Programs to have a Rules seminar by a Certified Judge.
· Offer debriefs with the Judges at Junior Regattas
· Offer incident reviews (open forum) without consequences
· Institute the "Blow a Whistle" idea in the SI's as a warning
· Judges enforce the rules by filing a protest
· Have a coaches meeting with the Judges prior to the event.
· Offer Arbitration at more events.
Final Statement - A Judges job is to adjudicate and educate by
promoting interaction between the RC, JC and Competitors.
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR 2004
Judges Manual: The manual was released last spring. Please send in any
comments, changes, additions, corrections etc. The Judges committee will
begin working on updating the Manual for the release of the 2005 - 2008
Rulebook as soon as the new rules become available in July 2004. The new
Rules will go into effect January 1, 2005.
The goal is to have the Updated Judges Manual available about November
1, 2005.
Workshops & Tests: The need is there to create a generic Course
Presentation to be available around the country allowing more
opportunities to attend seminars within shorter travel distances. This
issue is being addressed at the moment and the Judges Committee plans on
having this program available by the beginning of 2004.
Renewal policy questions were raised again with the following input:
· Should it be different for renewals as opposed to first time
certification? There were some opinions for and/or against this idea. Many
felt it was helpful in the Seminars to have a diverse range of expertise
among the attendees.
· Could we offer a seminar online with a proctored Test within a certain
timeframe? Would it be possible to separate the Seminar and Test?
· Our Insurance coverage relies on proof of certification or renewal.
· The need to approve a list of Instructors to ensure consistent
presentation of the seminars is imperative.
· It was stated that renewal by ISAF is different for IJ than the US
policy for National Judges.
Recruitment: Some Areas could use more judges where others are happy
with their attrition rate.
SOARS
Sandy Grosvenor reported on updates and changes to the SOARS system on
the website.
· Certification & renewal information with dates of seminars and
tests
· Category for apprentice judges
· Password change (may no longer be necessary or a cookie to remember)
· Test site coming with new info to "play around with".
· Online Event report form to fulfill requirement regarding Policy #6 in
Race Officials at US Championships?
The meeting was adjourned at 11:45 a.m.
The next meeting will be in Mobile, Alabama in March 2004.
Respectfully submitted,
Debbie Schoenherr, Secretary
Attachment: Race Officials at US SAILING Championships
GENERAL POLICY
1. No person may serve as a member of the protest committee or as the
principal race officer at an event in which any competitor in the event is
a close relative1.
2. Volunteers in any capacity are expected to subordinate their personal
and individual interests to the interests of the event and the sport of
sailing. See US SAILING Regulation 1.00.
3. The organizers shall use their best efforts to appoint US SAILING
certified race officials2 to the protest committee or the umpire team, and
to key positions on the race committee.
4. Except in illness or emergency, the protest committee shall consist of
a minimum of three judges.
5. Whenever possible, the organizers shall use their best efforts to
appoint:
a. A majority of US SAILING certified judges to the protest committee at
fleet racing events.
b. A minimum of 50% US SAILING certified umpires at match and team racing
events.
6. The organizing authority shall file an event report that includes the
names and certifications of all judges, umpires and principal race
officials.
EVENT POLICY
Ladder event, local level:
1. Recommend and encourage (but not require) the appointment of a US
SAILING certified race officer (any level) as principal race officer.
2. Recommend and encourage (but not require) the appointment of a US
SAILING certified judge (any level) as protest committee chairman.
3. At match or team racing events, require the appointment of a US SAILING
Umpire for chief umpire.
4. Exceptions may be made with the approval of the US SAILING Area
representatives to:
o The championship committee involved and
o The applicable race officials committee.1
1 For the purpose of this policy the term "close relative" is
defined as an individual related to another person or the person's spouse
within the third degree. This includes parents, grandparents,
great-grandparents, siblings, children, grandchildren,
great-grandchildren, spouses and close relatives of spouses including
step- or in-law relatives.
2 In all cases, the corresponding ISAF certification will be acceptable
in place of the US
SAILING certification. For example, an ISAF International Umpire may serve
without
approval in place of a US SAILING certified Umpire
Ladder event, Regional Sailing Association or US SAILING Area level:
1. Recommend and encourage the appointment of a US SAILING Regional or
National RO, but accept a certified US SAILING Club Race Officer.
2. Recommend and encourage the appointment of a US SAILING Senior Judge
for protest committee chairman, but accept a US SAILING Judge.
3. At match or team racing events, require the appointment of a US SAILING
Umpire for chief umpire.
4. Exceptions may be made with the approval of the US SAILING Area
representatives to:
o The championship committee involved and
o The applicable race officials committee.2
Ladder event finals and national championship events:
1. Require the appointment of a certified US SAILING Regional or National
Race Officer as PRO.
2. Require the appointment of a US SAILING Senior Judge as Protest
Committee Chairman. Require a majority of the protest committee to be US
SAILING certified judges.
3. At match or team racing events, require the appointment of a US SAILING
certified Umpire for chief umpire. Require a minimum of one half of the
umpire team to be US SAILING Umpires.
4. The only exception shall be a reduction in certification level.
Exceptions may be made with the approval of the US SAILING Area
representatives to:
o The championship committee involved and
o The applicable race officials committee.
5. If the requirements for an appointment cannot be met after allowing for
exceptions, an appointment of a certified official shall be made by the
applicable race officials committee
September 2003
1 The Area representative is the Regional Administrative Judge for
appointments to the
umpire team.
2 The Area representative shall be the Area Race Officer for
appointments to the race committee and the Regional Administrative Judge
for appointments to the protest committee or umpire team.
|