Inshore Committee Past Meeting Minutes (4/24/2001)
The US SAILING Inshore Committee met at the Adams Mark Hotel in Charlotte, NC on Saturday March 24, 2001. Chairman Larry White presided and Secretary Clark Chapin was present. Chairman White called the meeting to order at 1:38 PM. The following members were present:
(*=present)
4. Reports and Discussion 4.1. Youth Programs. James reported on several topics, including
continuing support for Sailing Smart, improved support for some marginal
at-risk youth programs, and some training for judges about the differences
between judging adult and youth events. Another topic was how junior events
should handle the new Appendix N dealing with on-the-water judging of
rule 42. 4.2. Sailing Smart. Betsy Altman’s presentation on Sailing Smart was discussed. The program’s successes were noted. 4.3. ISAF Issues. Dick Hannemann introduced the following issues. 4.3.1. Eligibility Code. US SAILING’s Prescription that makes the penalty for rule 20 violations a simple warning has resolved this problem adequately. 4.3.2. Advertising Code. US SAILING’s action in granting an advertising license to anyone whose class or organization has declared itself Category C has reduced most of the problems with this regulation as well. 4.4. Racing Rules Issues. The major rule change for 2001, the
new starting system, may cause some additional initial problems, but in the
long run, the change to a common world-wide system is an improvement.
Ali Meller said that his experience thus far has been very positive. It
works better by far than the older system. 4.5. Race Management Issues. Tom Farquhar was not present. 4.6. Industry Relations. Chip Johns was not present. Tom Hubbell
asked why large corporations sponsor events for small groups of sailors at
large expense rather than provide support for a much larger group of sailors?
Fred Hagedorn said that as an advertising venue, these events have some
utility, but sailing at the local or larger-based level is essentially a
charity. Contributions that are received are often the result of personal
relationships. 5. How Can Inshore Assist in Reaching US SAILING Priority Goals in 2001? The Committee discussed their impact on several of the priority goals, in particular: 1. Define and implement a plan that dramatically improves US SAILING’s communications, especially to volunteers, individual and organizational members. Ali Meller noted that the 5-O-5 class uses E-Mail very well to inform people
that are in the loop, but there is a need for paper to help bring people
"into the loop." Right now, American Sailor is down to a single
page and the trend is toward more electronic methods.
Ted Beier presented material based upon experiences at his club and its slow
decline over the last several years. The material is attached. Strategies chosen
were to: He gave examples of alternative activities to increase fun and participation. He solicited other ideas from this Committee and the ODCC. and promised to report back in October. Keith Graham noted his success with similar tactics in the Seattle Thistle fleet.
Clark Chapin
|