|
1210 Call to order by Ron Trossbach, Chairman
Action: The Chairman asked all committee members to verify with
him that they would like to remain as members for the coming year.
Members who cannot attend occasional meetings will be asked to serve in
an advisory role to the committee.
Committee members and observers introduced themselves. The following
Committee members and Advisors were present: Sheila McCurdy, Peter
Millard, Talbot Wilson, Chuck Hawley, Dan Nowlan, John Winder, Glenn McCarthy, Dan van Heeckeren,
Gene McCarthy, Stan Honey, Bruce Eissner, and Ron Trossbach.
The Committee reviewed the Terms of Reference for the SAS Committee’s
purpose, composition and function to update the 1987 version. A
corrected copy is attached. This will be submitted together with the
Committee Roster by Nov 1. Any comments on this should be sent to the
Chairman Ron Trossbach before
then.
Hanson Awards and Crew Overboard Research
- The Chairman stated that the committee has three areas of concern:
research, regulation and education. Among the ongoing research
activities of the committee have been the awarding of over 100 Arthur B.
Hansen Awards for rescue. Committee Advisor John Rousmaniere is
assembling a summary of Lessons Learned from this data base plus the
data bases of Lake Michigan and The Sailing Foundation of Seattle. This
should be completed this coming winter.
- Glenn McCarthy reported that 14 Hanson awards were given last year and
the feedback on the events is excellent with clubs feeling honored to
have members recognized for successful handling of life threatening
situations. He used the Lake Beulah rescue of a heart attack victim as
an example.
- Bruce Eissner noted that the research value of knowing how accidents
and rescues really happen are as important as the visibility given to US
SAILING.
- Chuck Hawley suggested that the summary of the incidents may help us
in recommendations for overboard recovery techniques, and he also noted
that sometimes overboard incidents are hushed up by the crews for a
number of reasons.
- John Winder reported that the Newport Bermuda Race this year had 4
crew go overboard from 3 boats. All were successfully rescued, and the
skippers have responded to letters asking about the incidents. The Race
organizers have had no means of getting reports but will be adding an
inquiry to the Certificate of Compliance which each skipper must turn in
at the end of the race.
- Bruce Eissner pointed out confidentiality issues that need to be
honored ranging from embarrassment to legal concerns which apply to the
small boat arena as well. He asked that committee members using e-mail
to discuss reports be careful in their opinions and
presentation of facts.
- Sheila McCurdy said that in the Bermuda Race while crew were not
clipping to the boat with harness tethers, at least the crews executed
fast and successful rescues of the crews in the water.
- Ron Trossbach mentioned that reports so far have indicated that having
a GPS with an MOB button at the helm is an advantage, that
reflective tape on gear being worn has been valuable, and the crews used
MOM flotation to aid in several recent rescues.
An observer voiced an opinion that fanny pack flotation may be more
trouble than it is worth and asked the Committee to review US SAILING
rules that allow the use of these devices in championship regattas
(Mallory Cup).
There was a general consensus to rely on voluntary reporting for the
foreseeable future.
Projects
1) ORC/ISAF compliance claims by manufactures of safety equipment.
- Chuck Hawley felt that this is a difficult issue and statement-makers
should be held accountable for their claims without
our passing judgment on the manufacturers.
- Bruce Eissner said that ISAF’s approach would likely be to charge
manufacturers for permission to publish the claim.
- Ron Trossbach favored informal approach of writing manufacturer for
explanation of claim if we detect a deficiency.
2) Sea anchors on MOB devises: Ron Trossbach will be looking for someone
to investigate their adequacy. Several recent reports have stated that
these devices blow away faster than a victim can swim after them.
3) Comparisons of MOB recovery maneuvers: John Bonds has donated $1000
to a project at the US Merchant Marine Academy under the supervision of
Eric Wallischeck. Status of study is available from Eric.
4) Lifeline study by Naval Academy, Ron Trossbach will ask for a status
report.
5) Crotch straps on PFDs. Bruce Eissner stated that rest of world
believes they should be mandatory.
6) Unconscious overboard victims: A serious circumstance that can be
approached the wrong way. Even adequate flotation may not prevent death
from a head injury or heart attack.
- Bruce Eissner pointed out that PFDs do not prevent head injuries.
Helmets do.
- Dan Van Heeckeren differentiated causes of unconsciousness.
Unconsciousness brought on by hypothermia is very survivable with
adequate PFD that can also facilitate reboarding.
- Chuck Hawley said that in tests in San Francisco Bay the best way to
retrieve an unconscious victim was to put a swimmer in a survival suit
in the water to attach a lifting sling to the victim.
7) Reboarding of rescued crew: Techniques and strategies have been
analyzed by Ron Trossbach. Conclusions need to be disseminated.
8) Offshore Newsletter: Bruce Eissner announced an on-line newsletter
from the Offshore Office that was launched with Sailrater recently.
9) Overhead power lines: A hazard at launching ramps that was addressed
by the committee some years ago with good result is
publicizing danger to local sailors around the country.
Action: Ron Trossbach will coordinate effort with the One Design
Council and review campaigns by other water and boating safety
groups.
10) Racing Rules of Sailing 1.1: Glenn McCarthy raised the issue that
the use of the word “possible” added greater onus to the racing
sailor to rescue another racer even to the extent of exposing the
rescuing boat and crew to great danger and goes beyond the accepted
practices of law of the sea. The Rules Committee will be submitting the
question to the Appeals Committee through the proper channels.
11) ISO and ISAF status report: Bruce Eissner said that the submission
deadline has changed. The Safety at Sea Committee needs to have formal
recommendations to the Offshore Office in July 2003. This year’s
recommendation of creation of a Category 5, on which Paul Miller took
the lead, will probably be approved.
Life rafts: Last year the new ISAF liferaft rule came into effect for
2003 implementation although specifications were not written. The ISAF
life raft is not “almost a SOLAS life raft” as has been reported.
The standards approved by the ISO have the force of law. The ISAF has
consultative status for development of a “yachtsman's liferaft for
seas of the world.” The Australian Coroner’s report of the Sydney
Hobart Race addressed the failures of liferafts. Alan Green is very
involved. Manufacturers around the world have given lots of input.
A US SAILING prescription put off implementation until specifications
were written and manufacturers could begin to comply. Old life rafts
will be grandfathered for racing but not cruising where the IMO standard
will apply. Bruce Eissner concluded by asking if deferral should be
continued or extended.
- Chuck Hawley said we should be careful about making owned good
property obsolete, but he doesn’t care for grandfathering being
applied to future purposes. He viewed the ISAF liferaft as pretty good,
but cautioned that from a manufacturing and marketing standpoint race
regulations should be very similar to the cruising market
specifications.
- Dan Van Heeckeren asked that the committee defer the question until
the next meeting.
- Peter Millard and others suggested that the Committee continue to
comply with 2004 date for ISAF specifications, and in the meantime
gather input from the US Marine Safety Association and others for
reasons to change that date if ISAF does not pass the specifications by
then.
- Bruce Eissner asked that the USMSA give comments to us and to Alan
Green.
- Sheila McCurdy presented the proposal of cooperation from USMSA (see
attached)
Action: Ron Trossbach will respond to USMSA.
12) Category 5 status: Category is designed for short races in warm
water with protected water close at hand.
- Chuck Hawley questioned the definition of “warm” and should a
Coast Guard or other authorities’ definition be used.
- Bruce Eissner said that such general terms are used intentionally to
let the race organizer decide.
13) RORC PFD rule: Ron Trossbach noted the change by the RORC and that
US SAILING is not planning on changing its rule.
14) Harnesses and tethers on offshore boats: Bruce Eissner suggested a
look at wording for a recommendation. He believes the antipathy toward
tethers is unjustifiable.
- Stan Honey recommends that a US SAILING Prescription be made that
recommends the use of flotation and a harness (at night or in cold water
etc.) become a requirement for Categories 0 and 1 (but still limited to
"at night or in cold water etc.").
- Sheila McCurdy suggested a harness use publicity
campaign based on falling overboard loses time and would be a transition
toward a rule in the future.
- Dan Nowlan and Stan Honey said that the TransPac is looking for
guidance.
Action: Ron Trossbach will rewrite ISAF 5.02.5 US SAILING
prescription to “and requires such PFDs and harnesses may be employed”
or words to that effect for category 1 monohulls and multihulls for
inclusion in the next edition of the Special Regulations. The proposed
wording will be circulated for comment before the Committee acts on it
at the Spring Meeting.
15) Multihulls: Bill Doelger verbally sent a report that there is
nothing new to report.
16) Inspection criteria: Peter Millard said the Around Alone Race uses
IMOCA rules, ISAF Category 0 and their own Notice of Race and has them
all combined onto a single checksheet. Other races have similar
inspection processes. The question asked was whether the process can be
standardized more for the benefit of inspectors/”scrutineers” and
the boat crews.
-Chuck Hawley mentioned issues with the Pacific Cup. If a boat fails
inspection there should be a clear method of rectifying and having the
correction signed off on. It would be helpful to gather feedback on gear
failures and to enforce more stringent inspection on those boats for the
next race. The work of inspectors who passed marginal boats with
failures should be reviewed and corrected as necessary
Action: A working party of Chuck Hawley, Peter Millard, Bill
Barton and Ron Trossbach will consider approaches and alternatives.
ISAF submissions:
17) The coax cable rule of 40% power loss over the run of the VHF cable
to the masthead is violated by most maxis according to Stan Honey who
recommended a table be added to the rule showing the type of cables over
different runs which would comply with the rule. He will provide a
comment for this table, which is already a US SAILING prescription to
Special Reg 3.29.1 (Table 15), before it is carried to the ISAF next
year.
18) Fully assembled anchor rule has caused trouble by the interpretation
that an anchor must be connected to the rode which could be dangerous
and has caused some boats to be remeasured.
Motion: In Special Reg 4.06.01, strike words “fully assembled
and” in two places from Table 12.
Seconded and carried.
Action: Ron Trossbach to send motion to US SAILING Board for
approval.
Action: Stan Honey and Chuck Hawley will recommend anchor sizes
for ranges of boat size.
19) Training Reg. 6.01: Discussion tabled until next meeting
Education
20) Safety Education Task Force Report: Ron
Trossbach spent two days with Timmy Larr this summer discussing issues
of safety and US SAILING’s approach to incorporating safety into its
programs and communications
- Tom Hubbell who is on the task force was at the meeting and said there
were 3 products for the safety at sea committee to consider:
1) a Safety at Sea seminar that satisfies 6.01
2) a course for category 2 and 3 sailors, and
3) an inshore program for safety.
Some of this can be accomplished by repackaging and marketing
material US SAILING has into new products on a collaborative track with
the Training Committee. The task force has recommended that the Safety
at Sea Committee be expanded to include inshore and cruising safety as
the Safety and Seamanship Committee under a board vice president.
- Bruce Eissner pointed out this change requires board action and a
change in the by-laws, but development of the new direction can start
now.
Action: All SAS Committee members and advisors are asked to
comment on this subject after reading the attached Safety Task Force
Report.
- Bruce Eissner said that the National Offshore Council is appointing a
committee to have offshore concerns addressed.
- Tom Hubbell said that Commercial Sailing and the Cruising Council also
have great interest in this and there is interest by sponsors.
- Ron Trossbach demonstrated some of the Australian Yachting Federation’s
20-module, interaction training CD and suggested a similar thing could
be taken cross-country by instructors in conjunction with powerpoint
presentations.
- Sheila McCurdy stressed that US SAILING already has a training and
instructor structure to use through the Training Office and US SAILING
certified instructors.
- Ron Trossbach said that action is being taken to reorganize the Safety
at Sea Institute for the running of seminars.
- Bruce Eissner said it was important to certify other safety training
that complies with our standards
New Business
21) SOSpenders recall: Gene McCarthy asked that the committee help in
publicizing the recall of the Millennium PFD.
3:02 Meeting adjourned
|